Rolling green hills and open land — Lords of the Lands
September 25, 2026Mumbai 3.0

Which Should You Buy: NA Plot or Agricultural Land?

In short

An NA plot may lawfully be built on; agricultural land may not, until its use position is resolved through the planning authority. More importantly, Maharashtra restricts who may purchase agricultural land at all — and the 2025 reform that simplified conversion left those restrictions untouched.

2Separate questions hidden inside “should I buy NA or agricultural?” — whether you may legally buy it at all (eligibility), and whether you may build on it (use classification). The 2025 NA reform changed the second. It did not touch the first.
NA plot versus agricultural land — open farmland before it is converted to plots
The choice between an NA plot and agricultural land like this is really two questions in one.

What is the actual difference between an NA plot and agricultural land?

Agricultural land is classified for farming; an NA plot has been cleared for residential, commercial, industrial or another approved use — and the difference splits into two questions buyers collapse into one: who may buy it, and whether you may build on it.

Agricultural land is classified for farming. Non-agricultural land has been cleared for residential, commercial, industrial or another approved use.

Two separate questions follow from that, and buyers routinely collapse them into one:

Question Agricultural land NA plot
Who may buy it? Restricted in Maharashtra Open
May you build on it? Not until the use position is resolved Yes, subject to zone and approvals
Home loan availability Difficult Generally available
Typical entry price Lower Higher
Resale market Narrower — restricted buyer pool Wider

The price gap between the two columns is not a discount. It is the cost, risk and time of moving from the left column to the right.

Who can legally buy agricultural land in Maharashtra?

Maharashtra restricts the purchase of agricultural land, and the restrictions turn on the purchaser’s status — a question of whether the sale is valid at all, so it is one for your advocate before you pay an advance, not after.

Maharashtra restricts the purchase of agricultural land. The restrictions turn on the purchaser’s status, and they continue to apply independently of how conversion now works.

Why eligibility is the first question, not the last

This is the single most consequential point in this article, because it is a question about whether the sale is valid at all — not about what you can build afterwards. A purchase made in breach does not become good because the buyer later intended to convert.

Because the position depends on the purchaser’s specific circumstances, this is a question for your advocate before you pay an advance, not after.

Can NRIs buy agricultural land in India?

No — under the foreign exchange framework NRIs and persons of Indian origin may acquire residential and commercial property but not agricultural land, plantation property or farmhouses, a national bar that sits on top of Maharashtra’s own restrictions.

No. Under the foreign exchange framework, non-resident Indians and persons of Indian origin may acquire residential and commercial immovable property in India, but not agricultural land, plantation property or farmhouses.

That prohibition is national and sits on top of Maharashtra’s own restrictions. An NRI buyer looking at land near Mumbai is therefore looking at NA plots, not agricultural parcels — a constraint worth establishing at the start of a search rather than the end.

Did the 2025 reform change any of this?

It changed conversion, not who may buy: the 2025 amendment abolished separate NA permission and the Sanad and replaced the annual tax with a one-time premium, but left the restrictions on buying agricultural land, tenure and zoning intact.

It changed conversion. It did not change who may buy.

The Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2025, issued 31 December 2025, abolished separate NA permission and the Sanad, and replaced the annual NA tax with a one-time premium. Conversion now runs through building plan approval from the planning authority.

What survived intact: the restrictions on purchasing agricultural land, every tenure restriction, and the zoning regime. A reform that made conversion easier did not make acquisition easier.

Is agricultural land a cheaper way in?

Sometimes — but the lower entry price is not a discount: buying agricultural land means taking on eligibility, the planning authority’s view of your use, the premium, any layout and infrastructure cost and the time it all takes, against work an NA plot has already de-risked.

The honest arithmetic: buying agricultural vs NA

Sometimes, and the arithmetic is worth doing honestly rather than assuming either way.

Buying agricultural land and converting it means you take on: eligibility to purchase at all, the planning authority’s view of your intended use, the one-time premium, layout and infrastructure costs if you are subdividing, and the time all of that takes. Against that, you enter at a lower price per unit area.

Buying an NA plot in a sanctioned layout means you pay for work someone else has completed and de-risked: the conversion position, the layout sanction, the internal roads, the drainage, the boundary, the access.

Neither is automatically better. What is not defensible is treating the price difference as free money.

What can go wrong with each?

With agricultural land: a void purchase on eligibility, a zone that blocks conversion, or a restricted tenure nobody budgeted for. With NA plots: NA mistaken for clean title, an unsanctioned layout, or an access road with no registered right of way.

With agricultural land, three failure modes recur. The purchase is void or voidable because the buyer was not eligible. The zone will not permit the intended use, so conversion has no route. Or the tenure — Class II, inam, watan, devasthan, tribal — requires a separate permission and premium nobody budgeted for.

With NA plots, the failures are quieter. NA status is treated as proof of clean title, which it is not. The layout turns out to be unsanctioned, so the “plot” has no legal existence as a plot. Or the access road shown in the brochure has no registered right of way behind it.

In both cases the problem is discoverable before payment. In both cases it is usually discovered afterwards.

How do you verify which one you are actually buying?

Start with the record, not the seller’s description: pull a certified 7/12, establish the tenure, identify the planning authority and land-use zone, ask for the sanctioned layout plan showing your plot number, and verify any MahaRERA number.

Start with the record, not the seller’s description.

Five steps to verify which one you are buying

  1. Pull a certified 7/12 extract and read the occupant column and the other rights column
  2. Establish the tenure — occupant Class I, Class II, or a restricted category
  3. Identify the planning authority and the parcel’s land-use zone under the applicable development plan
  4. If a layout is claimed, ask for the sanctioned layout plan showing your plot number as approved
  5. If a registered project is claimed, verify the MahaRERA registration number on the MahaRERA portal

A seller who cannot produce these quickly is telling you something.

How Lords of the Lands structures this

We develop sanctioned plotted layouts rather than selling unconverted parcels, which means the conversion position, the layout approval and the access are established before a plot is offered. That is the trade we ask buyers to pay for, and we think it should be stated plainly rather than implied.

Current layouts across the Karjat, Khopoli and coastal Raigad corridors are on our ongoing projects page. For the wider regional context, see Mumbai 3.0 and types of projects.

The short version

NA versus agricultural is two questions, not one. Whether you may build, and whether you may buy.

The 2025 reform made the first question easier to resolve. It did nothing to the second. So the order of enquiry for any agricultural parcel is: am I permitted to acquire this, what is its tenure, what does the zone allow — and only then, what would conversion cost.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between NA plot and agricultural land?

An NA plot has been cleared for non-agricultural use and may be built on subject to zone and approvals. Agricultural land is classified for farming, cannot be built on until its use position is resolved, and in Maharashtra is subject to restrictions on who may purchase it.

Can an NRI buy agricultural land in India?

No. NRIs and PIOs may acquire residential and commercial property but not agricultural land, plantation property or farmhouses.

Can I convert agricultural land to NA myself?

Since 31 December 2025 there is no separate NA application. Conversion comes through building plan approval from the planning authority, with a one-time premium of 0.10% to 0.50% of market value by plot size.

Is agricultural land a good investment?

It carries a lower entry price and a narrower resale market, because the pool of eligible buyers is restricted. Whether that trade suits you depends on your eligibility, your horizon and your tolerance for conversion risk.

Does NA status mean the title is clear?

No. Conversion and title are separate. An NA plot can still carry defective title, restricted tenure or no legal access.

Related reading

NA, conversion and status

Who may buy, and tenure

Records and title

Strategy and context

Citations and sources

Sources: Maharashtra Land Revenue Code (Second Amendment) Act, 2025, issued 31 December 2025; Foreign Exchange Management Act, 1999 and RBI rules on acquisition of immovable property in India by NRIs and PIOs; MahaRERA. Current as at September 2026. General information, not legal advice. Eligibility to purchase agricultural land depends on the purchaser’s specific circumstances — take advice before you commit. Official sources: UDCPR / Urban Development Dept · Maharashtra Government Resolutions · Mahabhumi 7/12 (Bhulekh).

author avatar
Girish Chhalwani Co-founder
Girish is the Co-Founder of Lords of the Lands, he combines market intelligence, infrastructure research, product thinking and development strategy to transform raw land into thoughtfully planned plotted communities. His ability to identify emerging growth corridors, assess long-term development potential and shape product direction ensures that every project begins with a strong strategic and design foundation.